Super Green thingy!! a la mode Giuseppe Arcimboldo, a la mode Hieronymus Bosch, a la mode Paul Jaisini, a la mode Gleitzeit ...

 People get trapped on the internet without “a warning” that internet would serve you right if you use it for REAL WORK - it is priceless for the amount of info one gets for instance I found all matches on the current topic of INVISIBLE and invisibility. 

Again if it wasn’t for the sources available on the www where people supply and share info I wouldn’t be able to understand the meaning and importance of Paul Jaisini and his Invisible art since the time he destroyed his genius paintings sometime around 1994.

If it wasn’t for the internet I wouldn’t be writing this now as I wouldn’t know about the widespread phenomena and popularity, but the “discovery” made me realize the connection of the social phenomena to the visual art, that is important, when nothing in visual art really connect to the vast unknown dimension of the “real people”. 

Fed Up Love GIF By Re Modernist

Dimensions: 480 x 333 px

Uploaded: 06/5/2015 

Size: 3.2 MB 

1,135,597 Views 

pink silk glamour gif stages of art gif

I noticed that the invisible paintings started to create the visible paintings that were not my creation. Paul Jaisini

neon glow gif

Gleitzeit Art Documented from Paul Jaisini

Untitled from Stelly Riesling-Katzenelnbogen

Art Versus Porn

There seems to be a downright dark age confusion among people as to what is considered pornography and what is art. There is a very obvious, strong, simple distinction. Pornography is meant to arouse the body, specifically the genital area. Art is meant to arouse the mind, heart, soul. There is no idea or concept behind pornography and its sole purpose is provide instant visual sexual stimulation to the viewer, whereas art serves the sole purpose of making you think, contemplate, use your head in a complex manner that creativity stimulates in us. It would take a lot more effort and imagination to be sexually aroused by a nude work of art, for instance, than a straightforward pornographic image. Art, at its very nature, has no relation to an industry as low as pornography–works of art stand apart from it like a mansion from a mobile home. Only an idiot with an IQ of 20 wouldn’t know the difference. It’s true that art can be as explicit as porn sometimes, but how is that a bad thing if its objective is never to arouse sexually, thus putting an entirely different label on it? If art ever does use porn as a subject, only in an obvious way to make a philosophical point or social statement, to make fun of it or degrade it. Art is creation. Porn is destruction. Polar opposites. Ignorance is the enemy here. http://www.artlimited.net/image/en/509544